DVORAK v. STATE, 2001 ND 50

625 N.W.2d 264

Larry H. Dvorak, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee.

No. 20000352.Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Decided March 20, 2001.

NOTE: SUMMARY OPINION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1

Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Zane Anderson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Larry H. Dvorak, pro se, P.O. Box 5521, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5521.

Owen K. Mehrer, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 130, Dickinson, N.D. 58602-0130, for respondent and appellee.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Larry Dvorak appealed from an order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J., Carol Ronning Kapsner, Dale V. Sandstrom, Mary Muehlen Maring, William A. Neumann.

Charles J. Gilje and Kenneth L. Dalsted (argued), Special Assistant Attorneys General, 208 Second Avenue SW, P.O. Box 1727, Jamestown, N.D. 58402-1727, for petitioner and appellee.

Randall L. Hoffman, 216 Northland Estates, Jamestown, N.D. 58401, for respondent and appellant.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] On remand, based on this Court’s opinion in Interest of J.S., 2001 ND 10, the district court entered written findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the continued treatment of J.S. at the State Hospital and the availability of less restrictive treatment. Relying on the testimony of both Dr. William Pryatel and J.S., the district court concluded J.S. is a danger to himself or others if not treated. The district court also concluded less restrictive treatment is not possible because the testimony established J.S. would not remain on prescribed medication under less restrictive conditions. Concluding the district court’s continuing treatment order is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

BULLINGER v. SUNDOG INTERACTIVE, INC., 2023 ND 138 (2023)

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT JULY 19, 2023 STATE OF…

2 years ago

HAGEN v. NORTH DAKOTA INSURANCE RESERVE FUND, 2023 ND 132 (2023)

IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT JULY 19, 2023 STATE OF NORTH…

2 years ago

MOLL v. MOLL, 231 N.W.2d 769 (1975)

Margaret MOLL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Joseph P. MOLL, Defendant and Appellee. Civ. No. 9095.Supreme…

8 years ago

ENGLUND v. STATE, 2001 ND 2

625 N.W.2d 264 Mitchell Nels Englund, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent…

8 years ago

OLSON v. N.D. DEPT. OF TRANSP. DIRECTOR, 523 N.W.2d 258 (N.D. 1994)

Joshua Jeffrey OLSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIRECTOR, Defendant and…

8 years ago

KALDOR v. BJERKE, 300 N.W.2d 202 (N.D. 1980)

Jean T. KALDOR, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Chauncey T. Kaldor, and John…

8 years ago