798 N.W.2d 878

Derek Lynn Foreid, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee.[1]

No. 20100325.Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Decided February 8, 2011

[1] Rehearmg Denipd March 22. 2011.

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Douglas L. Mattson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Mark T. Blumer, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, N.D. 58072, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Rozanna C. Larson, State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5005, Minot, N.D. 58702-5005, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Derek Foreid appeals from a trial court order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Foreid alleges prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel, and asserts he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). See, e.g., Ude v. State, 2009 ND 71, ¶ 12, 764 N.W.2d 419 (affirming an order summarily dismissing an application for post-conviction relief because the petitioner failed to present any competent evidence raising an issue of material fact).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Tagged:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *